Editorial illustration
The Trump administration is facing yet another lawsuit from the permanent bureaucracy’s legal arm, this time over the dismantling of the National Center for Atmospheric Research — a federally-funded climate research outfit that’s been burning through taxpayer dollars for decades. While the academic establishment and their lawyer allies rush to court, President Trump continues delivering on his promise to drain the swamp and redirect resources toward priorities that actually serve the American people.
NCAR has long operated as a node in the vast climate-industrial complex, producing study after study that just happen to conclude America needs more regulation, less energy independence, and bigger government. The pattern is unmistakable: federal grants flow to researchers who produce findings supporting the administrative state’s expansion, while dissenting voices get frozen out of funding and publication. It is not science when the conclusion is written before the research begins.
The lawsuit, filed by the usual coalition of activist attorneys and university stakeholders, claims the Trump administration violated procedural rules in moving to break up NCAR. What’s missing from their legal briefs is any compelling argument for why American taxpayers should continue funding an organization that primarily serves to justify policies undermining domestic energy production and exporting jobs to China. They do not defend NCAR’s record because that record does not hold up to scrutiny.
Enter the University of Colorado Boulder, which has proposed some alternative arrangement to preserve NCAR’s funding stream under a different administrative structure. This is not about protecting valuable research — it is about protecting jobs for academics and maintaining the flow of federal dollars into university coffers. When you have built an entire career on government grants, the prospect of actually having to demonstrate value to private funders or the marketplace is terrifying.
The contrast with how these same legal institutions responded to the Biden administration could not be more stark. When Biden bypassed Congress to forgive student loans, open the border, or impose vaccine mandates on private businesses, the procedural warriors were largely silent. But when Trump uses his constitutional authority to reorganize federal research priorities, suddenly every technicality becomes a federal case. The selective outrage reveals the game — this is not about rule of law, it is about protecting ideological institutions from democratic accountability.
What is really at stake here is bigger than one research center. NCAR represents a key piece of infrastructure for the climate narrative that has been used to justify everything from killing the Keystone Pipeline to imposing crushing regulations on American manufacturing. The research it produces feeds into EPA rulemaking, international climate agreements, and the broader project of transitioning America away from energy abundance toward dependence on Chinese-manufactured solar panels and wind turbines. Breaking up NCAR is not just budget trimming — it is disrupting a propaganda pipeline.
President Trump was elected specifically to challenge this ecosystem of mutually-reinforcing institutions that have captured enormous power without ever facing voters. The universities, the federal agencies, the activist lawyers, and the media outlets that uncritically report their findings form a closed loop that treats American taxpayers as an ATM and American workers as acceptable collateral damage in their ideological project. Every lawsuit, every protest, every hysterical press release just confirms that Trump is over the target.
The American people have a right to ask what they have received for decades of NCAR funding. Have their energy bills gone down? Have their communities become more prosperous? Or has this research primarily served to justify policies that benefit China, enrich Wall Street’s ESG investors, and concentrate power in Washington? The answer is obvious to anyone not drawing a salary from the climate-industrial complex.
Trump should keep swinging the axe. The lawsuits are annoying but ultimately just noise — the sound of entrenched interests discovering that the gravy train has finally left the station.
Providence watches over the bold.
About The Author
